#Archicad vs revit software

Project Size: Revit doesn’t work well for residences or smaller projects that don’t have flat roofs.

Autodesk is more visible and accessible, with large volume of Revit training resources.

Worldwide Acceptance: ArchiCAD is used mainly in Europe, while Revit has a wider acceptance globally.

Revit has shadows and reflections, shading design, solar analysis, acoustic analysis, thermal analysis, whole building energy analysis, detailed weather analysis, design alternatives analysis, ventilation and airflow, water usage and costs evaluation, photovoltaic potential, wind energy potential, daylighting, etc.

The information for the product is manually entered. There is a drop-down menu for building type, with three choices: heavyweight, medium and lightweight. ArchiCAD lets you easily change and customize every element in the project and allows global changes only if set up right or scheduled properly otherwise you will have to change everything one by one.Įnergy Analysis: ArchiCAD has an energy modeling program, but it doesn’t seem as robust as Ecotect and Green Building Studio. Accuracy: One of the significant differences between Revit and ArchiCAD is that Revit changes things globally and offers a much higher level of accuracy, which is important for large projects.It is to be noted that though ArchiCAD is better with detailing, Revit handles plan notes efficiently. ArchiCAD has drafting tools with which you can easily work with your BIM elevations and sections. Drafting and Detailing: When it comes to drafting and detailing, ArchiCAD is better than Revit.

Line Weight Management: As this feature is similar to AutoCAD’s system, learners find it easier to understand and manage.In ArchiCAD you can go into perspective and easily walk around the building back and forth at any time. 3D Issues: In Revit, 3D is only axonometric.ArchiCAD would require layer combinations. Demolition Work: Demolition work is well worked out in Revit because of its phase and phase filters options.Both programs give you wall priority options. ArchiCAD doesn’t offer so much flexibility. You can use filled regions, invisible lines, etc. You can easily fix those wall joins in Revit. Level of Flexibility: Revit offers greater flexibility to designers and architects.ArchiCAD has a faster learning curve than Revit. Learning Curve: Revit is somewhat complicated.It will enable architects, owners and contractors to make more informed decisions. From an architectural production and coordination perspective, we have drawn a comparison between ArchiCAD and Revit. Two of the biggest BIM players in the market are ArchiCAD by Graphisoft and Revit Architecture by Autodesk.

#Archicad vs revit software

The selection of suitable software contributes to the BIM process. Before transitioning to the process, bear a couple of things in mind: don’t equate BIM with BIM utility and don’t think Revit is the only player in the BIM world. In these times, we need to focus on innovation.īIM is inevitable in the AEC industry. (Read Building Information Modeling: A Valuable Tool for Home Builders.)īIM has been perhaps the biggest change in architectural design and construction management since computers became available for common office use. We will unveil the hidden treasure of BIM modeling and explain why transitioning to the BIM process is a worthy decision for architects, designers, structural engineers and construction professionals. As revolutionary as BIM is, there are some architects, designers, and students who, for whatever reason, have stuck to the old way of designing and constructing buildings. This incident suggests that the landscape in the design and construction industry is changing rapidly. An architect at the back of the room raised his hand to ask, “Why didn’t you design in CAD?” The design team’s response was, “What’s that?” and the room became quiet. He started talking about BIM, as the whole project was designed with BIM. One of the design team leaders was describing how they designed their project.